Tuesday, 21 August 2007

G. Edward Griffin - A World Without Cancer - The Story Of Vitamin B17


55 min 13 sec - Apr 7, 2006
Average rating: (408 ratings)

G. Edward Griffin marshals the evidence that cancer is a deficiency disease - like scurvy or pellagra - aggravated by the lack of an essential food compound in modern man's diet. That substance is vitamin B17.

In its purified form developed for cancer therapy, it is known as Laetrile. This story is not approved by orthodox medicine. The FDA, the AMA, and The American Cancer Society have labeled it fraud and quackery. Yet the evidence is clear that here, at last, is the final answer to the cancer riddle.

Why has orthodox medicine waged war against this non-drug approach? The author contends that the answer is to be found, not in science, but in politics - and is based upon the hidden economic and power agenda of those who dominate the medical establishment.

With billions of dollars spent each year on research, with other billions taken in on the sale of cancer-related drugs, and with fund-raising at an all-time high, there are now more people making a living from cancer than dying from it.

If the solution should be found in a simple vitamin, this gigantic industry could be wiped out over night. The result is that the politics of cancer therapy is more complicated than the science.

.oOo.)=(.oOo.


Amygdalin (from Greek: ἀμυγδάλη, almond), C20H27NO11, is a glycoside isolated from bitter almonds by Pierre-Jean Robiquet and A. F. Boutron-Charlard in 1803, and subsequently investigated by Liebig and Wöhler in 1830, and others.

Some sources claim Ernst T. Krebs was the discoverer of the substance, and Krebs is generally credited with popularizing it as a purported cancer cure and as "Vitamin B17."

Amygdalin is also called laevomandelonitrile, or laetrile for short. Some claim that laetrile is derived from a Latin word meaning "joyfulness" as laetari is the Latin verb meaning "to rejoice or exult".

quote from Wikipedia


.oOo.)=(.oOo.


The bitter almond is rather broader and shorter than the sweet almond, and contains about 50% of the fixed oil which also occurs in sweet almonds.

It also contains the enzyme emulsin which, in the presence of water, acts on amygdalin - a soluble glycoside - yielding glucose, cyanide and the essential oil of bitter almonds which is nearly pure benzaldehyde.

Bitter almonds may yield from 6 to 8% of hydrogen cyanide. Extract of bitter almond was once used medicinally.
quote from Wikipedia









Vaccination & Ritalin - The Hidden Truth


Vaccination - The Hidden Truth
1 hr 30 min 31 sec - Apr 10, 2006

Average rating: (643 ratings)

This is a shocking but extremely informative video documentary: "Vaccination - The Hidden Truth" (1998) where fifteen people, including Dr. Viera Scheibner (a PhD researcher), five medical doctors, other researchers, reveal what is really going on in relation to illness and vaccines.

Ironically, the important facts come from the orthodox medicine's own peer-reviewed research.

With so much government and medical promotion of vaccination for prevention of disease, the video is clearly devoted to presenting the other side of the issue that parents and others are not being told.

The result is a damning account of the ineffectiveness of vaccines and their often harmful effects. It declares that parents are not being told the truth by the media, the Health Department and the medical establishment, with a medical doctor, Dr. Mark Donohoe, confessing that "It is a problem for me that I am part of a profession that is systematically lying to people."

Find out how vaccines are proven to have harmful effects to your health and why do we still have to be vaccinated although there is no real need for it. Although many people simply refuse to believe this, the impeccable documentation presented in this amazing video has changed the minds of many who saw it.

Added: 24 September 2007


Mercury, Autism and the Global Vaccine Agenda
1 hr 31 min 16 sec - Aug 15, 2006
Average rating:
(231 ratings)

David Ayoub, M.D. goes through the relations of Mercury to Autism as well its connections to “National Security Study Memorandum 2000” for population control.

Showing its shocking connections to today’s G.A.V.I. Are powerful forces really trying to help the poor people or could it be for another agenda; the sterilization of the poor? This is an upsetting video, so brace yourself.

Here is another lecture to add to the collection of video research.
(Well, you do have your weeding gloves on, right??)


Added: 4 October 2007




The Drugging of Our Children by Garry Null
1 hr 43 min 4 sec - Oct 20, 2005

Average rating: (693 ratings)
In the absence of any objective medical tests to determine who has ADD or ADHD, doctors rely in part on standardized assessments - and the impressions of teachers and guardians.

They leave little room for other causes or aggravating factors, such as diet, or environment.

Hence, diagnosing a child or adolescent with ADD or ADHD is often the outcome of this subjective assessment, even though the organic basis for either disease has yet to be clinically proven.

Upon diagnosis, psychiatrists may prescribe psychotropic drugs for the children without first making it clear to parents that these medications can have severe side-effects. These include insomnia, loss of appetite, headaches, psychotic symptoms and even potentially fatal adverse reactions, such as cardiac arrhythmia.

And yet, despite these dangers, many school systems actually work with government agencies to force parents to drug their children, threatening those who refuse with the prospect of having their children taken from the home unless they cooperate.

So you give hyperactive kids speed - what do you think is going to happen?
Additional information available from your local corner junkie.

Friday, 3 August 2007

Open Your Eyes - UFO Video and Testimony


Compilation of UFO Video Footage and Testimony

1 hr 35 min 10 sec - May 28, 2006
Average rating:
(405 ratings)

Footage and Testimony from well qualified witnesses. Raw information. No editorial agenda.

Will you watch this all the way through? Will it awaken you? Then forward this link to at least 1 other person.

Wake up. It's time to move on. The path to our future is indicated by this evidence.
Indeed, here we have – likely – the most objective UFO research release to-date. “Why?”, you may ask.

Well, for starters, there is no stupid dramatic commentary by a Star Trek graduate. In fact, there is very little in terms of spoken word altogether – with the exception of raw and uncut interviews with various famous people.

This is not to say that the interviewees themselves have no agenda – it’s just that everything included here is presented as-is.

That’s fantastic in itself.

The footage is gob-smacking, indisputable, well-researched and spans the period from the 60’s up to the current times. If you are patient and carefully follow the movie, you will quickly realise how the UFO sightings have evolved over time.

The complexity of the sightings and the quality of the recorded footage have been steadily improving from the time of the first video images.

If you enjoy hype and dramatisation, you might want to investigate the next video. After all, sometimes, to get the message through, you gotta yell it in one’s face.

Added: 20 September 2007



UFO - The Greatest Story Ever Denied
1 hr 34 min 2 sec - Dec 24, 2006

Average rating: (2267 ratings)
This is the best of the whole story of UFO investigation that we have today. It’s an All in One, UFO’s Prophecy and technology.
Here is another great video summary of the best UFO evidence and testimony.
You might wanna have a look before it disappears completely.

Except… in the case of this movie – just as is the case with most mainstream UFO documentaries, certain assumptions are made about the purpose of the alien visitation.

Without going into the debate about the meaning of the word “alien”, it’s all too easy to fall back asleep and convince oneself that these things are completely benign in nature. That somehow we are aggressive and ignorant towards the alien civilisation (or civilisations) visiting our planet.

Now, when somebody says to you, “Of course they are friendly. If they weren’t, we would have been annihilated a long time ago…”

Such reasoning does not consider the possibility of you being food.

Added: 25 September 2007



Alien Autopsy - Original Footage
16 min 41 sec - Dec 24, 2006

Average rating: (97 ratings)


Session 950812

A: They are very real and physical in fourth density, too. The difference is that fourth density physicality is not the same as third density physicality. But that is not to say that there is no physicality in fourth density. (…)
Third density physicality, however, remains constant on third density. When a being or a craft or an instrument of any kind manufactured or conceived in fourth density arrives in third density, it is able to navigate through third density in fourth density reality.
However, when it malfunctions, whatever is left of it remains in third density.

(…)

Q: (L) Okay. So we have some real things happening, and a possibility that a film was taken of this interaction with these malfunctioning fourth density beings and craft. And, supposedly, this film is going to be shown on television. Is this film of this autopsy, and examination of craft remains, a true filming of same, or is it a fake, or fraud?

A: Well, one would suggest that for the maximum amount of learning, that the film be witnessed by those seeking the truth, in order to determine for themselves whether or not it is factual, as such will be possible upon viewing.


Session 950902

Q: (L) Well, on the subject of abduction: we watched a film on television, (…) that was a purported video of an alien autopsy, or, more correctly, an autopsy on an alien body. Was this, in fact, an alien?

A: How do you define "alien?"

Q: (L) Was it a being other than a naturally born human on this planet as we know human beings?

A: That is correct.

Q: (L) It was other than a naturally born human?

A: Correct.

Q: (L) Okay. What kind of a being was this?

A: Hybrid.

Q: (L) What was it a hybrid of - combining what elements?

A: Cybergenetic creatures you refer to as "Grays," and earth human such as yourself, third density. So, in essence, it was a hybridization of a 3rd density and 4th density being.


Session 951202

Q: (L) (…) While watching the alien autopsy film, we saw a massive organ that occupies the whole center of the abdominal cavity. What was that?

A: Heart/liver.

Q: (L) (S) A combination of both in one?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) They also carefully removed a solid or hard object which they then put in a small container. What was this object?

A: Crystal transceiver.

Q: (L) What was all the loose matter?

A: Organic tissue. Not important.

Q: (L) Was it a female or a male?

A: Both and neither.

Q: (L) Was it a being that could reproduce sexually?

A: No.

Q: (L) What kind of nourishment was required by that being?

A: Saline gelatin globules.

Q: (L) Did it eat as we do, through the mouth?

A: Cordates.

Q: (L) What? What is that?

A: Applications using biological microforms to metastasize through primary glandular channels.

Q: (L) Did that being use oxygen as in breathing?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Where were the lungs?

A: Side of torsal cavity.


Excerpts from research by:



Added: 3 October 2007


UFO Conference 2005 - Jamie Maussan
1 hr 33 min 23 sec - May 3, 2006

Average rating: (930 ratings)
Out of this world videos! We have to force the government to release ALL secrets!
Well, if you read this far - you should be rewarded for your curiosity.
Here is some latest research for mulling over.

Just rememeber - food can run.

Thursday, 2 August 2007

Wi-Fi - A Warning Signal (BBC Panorama)


29 min 7 sec - May 22, 2007
Average rating: (35 ratings)

Britain is in the grip of a Wi-Fi revolution with offices, homes and classrooms going wireless - but there is concern the technology could carry health risks.

The Government insists Wi-Fi is safe, but a Panorama investigation shows that radio frequency radiation levels in some schools are up to three times the level found in the main beam of intensity from mobile phone masts.

Excellent Documentary clearly showing that there is a danger with radiation coming from wi fi devices.

This is a rather interesting piece on the potential dangers of mobile technologies.

I don't think it is a surprise to anyone that mobile phone towers and wireless hubs emit microwave radiation. It is generally stated that the low-level radiation is harmless to humans and animals.

Well, I don't think it would be reasonable to assume that this sort of emissions will have no effect on the chemistry of living things at all. To what extent they cause passive damage to the cells remains to be established - if it's ever going to be established.

With conflicting interests, it would be hard to imagin that either the governments or the large corporations are ever going to say anything along those lines.

Also, there really is nowhere to hide - is there. I mean, after all the towers are everywhere. Perhaps, there are some good ways of limiting the exposure. Personally, I do not use wireless at home and try to keep the mobile phone away at all times. Networking computers with cables is more reliable and quicker - especially if you use the Gigabit protocols for your LAN.

I also strongly believe that the Sun flares can affect the reliability of the wireless networks. For this reason, I would recommend that hardiwred cable connections are available for fall-back purposes.

I have been reading all over the place that suppliements like Melatonin are able to repair some of the DNA damage caused by the low-level microwave emissions in our environment...


Loose Change (2nd Edition)


1 hr 29 min 22 sec - Aug 16, 2006

Average rating:
(35658 ratings)

Dylan Avery, Korey Rowe, and Jason Bermas bring you the most powerful 9/11
Documentary yet. Updated.
Yeah, this one is a wow one.

There is a whole heap of people out there who really question what happened on 11 September 2001 in New York. Many will tell you that it is all in plain sight - for all to see.

Yes, conspiracy theories are great. The sheer term "conspiracy theory" gives you chills and is rather exciting. Lots of people who believe in them are also very anal about the very term - they spend ages ranting on about how unfair and derogatory it is to label some belief a conspiracy theory.

I think they should get over that feeling - I think it's great for marketing. It's naughty. It's dirty. It's a dirty dark conspiracy theory.

Robert Anton Wilson on the cover of his bestseller "Everything Is Under Control" also added: "Just because you're not paranoid doesn't mean they're not plotting against you..."

Gotta love it.

Of course, many so called "investigators" came up with all sorts of theories and scenarios to explain what we saw on our television screens that day. Some were more sucessful at gaining the public's trust than others...

After all, when you carefully look at the raw footage and take a few moments to just think - the ugly reality of those fateful events begins to rear its ugly head. Things don't add up. Things are suspiciously fast. Things are suspiciously pulverised.

Where does one begin the search for the answers?

I have always said as follows - make an honest effort to investigate everything that happens around you by examining the raw evidence at hand. Then ask yourself the question - "Who Benefits?"

There is no point in starting at the end of the investigation and wondering why something happens. It is much easier to first look at the apparent - or perceived - stakeholders in each situation. What is there to gain from the situation - and thus who benefits from it.

This can be hard. But when investigated carefully and systematically - without introducing personal bias - each event in our everyday lives begins to light up with a meaning.

The final answer to "Why?" will then logically follow. This is the objective of the exercise. This is the carrot at the end of the stick.

Of course, sometimes it is not easy to gather the raw data and things need to be dug out from very obscure sources. You could even say that at times this job is larger than one person. A whole team of investigators might even be required in order to approximate the record of the actual events.

And here, any seeker of the factual will inevitably encounter a major stumbling block. It is especially true in this case - regarding the collapse of the Twin Towers (and Building 7!). The more people are introduced into the investigation, the larger the risk of personal bias. The muddier your picture becomes.

In fact, the more people start working on any project, the greater the need for some sort of summary work, an index to the group effort. And even then - this "index" needs to be compiled by somebody of a particularly refined ability to put the puzzle pieces together - without introducing unnecessary cognitive filters.

That is a lot to ask of a scribe. However, I believe that this is not entirely impossible! I believe that there are people of exceptional skill that devote countless hours of sifting through raw data and other research - and then put it in a coherent whole.

A few efforts of scientific and unbiased evidence investigation have already been presented to the public. The movie above is one such attempt.

I also like the book written by Laura Knight-Jadczyk and Joe Quinn called
9/11: The Ultimate Truth
(2nd ed.)